Too much TV might spoil your… prose writing

I’m aware the title of this blogpost might sound like old-fogey nagging, but it has a serious point. And, to reassure you, the cure is easy.

We learn storytelling from just about anything, and much of it without realising. TV and movies are a huge part of our lives and while they’re great teachers for some aspects, they’re not so good for others.    

There are several common issues I see in novel manuscripts where the writer is thinking with TV/movie brain. So here’s how to reboot your prose brain.

Problem: lack of description

The writer doesn’t set up the scene with description. In a movie or TV show, the scene-setting isn’t dwelt on, so it doesn’t get noticed. It comes alongside the action and dialogue. However, prose needs to take deliberate extra beats to create the environment because the reader can’t see what’s around the characters. If we don’t show this, it creates a peculiar effect, like being blindfolded. I’ve read manuscripts where I thought the character was confined to one room in a kind of blank mind-jail, when actually he was staying in a nice hotel. 

Some writers load the description at the start of the scene, then fail to keep it in the reader’s mind. They concentrate on the characters’ spoken lines and actions, but don’t keep the environment alive. This is disorientating for the reader.

Reboot your prose brain Readers need their inner vision to be fed – and their inner hearing too. Think of a radio play – it’s quite obvious there how the scene is ‘decorated’. If the characters are in a café, there might be a spoon chinking against a mug, a low hum of chatter from other customers. You barely notice it because it’s going on at the same time as the foregrounded action, but it’s been deliberately added to make the scene lifelike. There might be one or two moments where a character interacts with the environment in an aside – in the café they might make a remark about the cake they’re trying to resist.

And that’s how you keep the environment alive in a prose scene. Use it as part of the action. If a character’s sitting at a desk, they could tap their finger on it while thinking about what to say next. Make them react to it too – like the character longing for cake.

Use anything physical to bring the scene alive. What about their clothes? If a character is wearing a ballgown, the skirt material might rustle as they shift position.

Problem: lack of background about the viewpoint characters

I see quite a lot of manuscripts where we aren’t told enough about the viewpoint character. We see them doing things, but we don’t know who they are, where they are, why they are there, how old they are – and this isn’t a deliberate artistic choice. Although we don’t want to overload the reader with the characters’ life stories, there are certain things we simply can’t work out.

In a movie or TV show, we get all this at a glance. In prose, we need to be told.

Reboot your prose brain Make yourself a checklist – ensure you sneak this information in somehow. Have you let us know your character’s life circumstances? How old they are? How successful? How healthy? How happy? What relationships they have? All these details provide important context.

Problem: lack of interiority and reaction

In movies and TV, we usually can’t get inside a viewpoint character’s mind. So if something happens that provokes a reaction, we have to see it expressed – physically or verbally. But if this is how you show reactions in prose, it looks quite empty. But prose has a delightful quality that some writers underuse – it can put us inside the character’s mind and heart.

Reboot your prose brain If your narrative style allows, remember you can let the reader experience the reaction in the character’s mind and heart. Don’t just show it on the outside with facial expressions and dialogue. You have a whole other register for communication – your viewpoint character’s thoughts and feelings.

There are many possible ways a character could react to a plot event – you have to specify those reactions! Furthermore, you can show the complexity of the people you’ve created. You can explore mixed feelings and unexpected responses.

But what if you want to be economical and let the reader fill the gaps from their knowledge of the context? Yes, you can do that – but you have to teach the reader about the character first. So in the early part of the story you show the reader that, for instance, a character is secretly in love with another character. Much later, you can show the character being rejected and you might not need to show the devastation this will cause – the reader will know. But if you’ve never taught the reader what emotion a character feels about a thing or another person… the reader won’t know. 

Don’t forget to go inside a viewpoint character’s reaction.

Problem: dialogue lacks an interior dimension

This is similar to the previous point. TV and movie dialogue does a lot with the characters’ actions or tone of voice. A writer might attempt to describe these in a dialogue scene – so we get reactions, gestures and expressions, but they might not mean a lot to the reader.

Reboot your prose brain Gestures and expressions can certainly be useful, but they’re not the most effective way to help the reader understand what the characters are feeling. Use interiority as well, as above.

Problem: dialogue has too many mundanities

TV and movie dialogue often has a lot of warm-up. Hello, how was your journey, sit over there, I’ll take your coat, let me put the kettle on, I was up at four this morning because the bairn wouldn’t sleep.

This human noise is necessary because we’re following the action in real time, it looks natural, and we’re also settling in for the real meat of the scene – perhaps seeing relationships, an environment (see my first point), getting a sense of anticipation. The actors’ actual words are quite mundane, but we’re not meant to be paying much attention to them.

However, this mundane dialogue doesn’t work so well in prose. I see a lot of scenes in novels that go:

‘Hello, how was your journey?’

‘Fine, thanks.’

‘I’ll take your coat, let me put the kettle on.’

‘Oh, thank you, I need caffeine, I’ve been up since four because…’

That’s four whole lines of not very much.

Of course, there are situations where this might be valuable – if there is something interesting for the reader to notice. For instance, if you’ve laid the ground for the reader to interpret awkwardness or tension, or to be very curious about every moment of this encounter. But many writers do this just to get a scene under way, because that’s how TV does it.

Reboot your prose brain Although you need some of this, and scene setting is important, you don’t need nearly as much as a TV or movie script would. You certainly don’t need to follow every step in real time – an artful condensing will work just as well. Use it, as I’ve said, if there is something the reader will enjoy noticing. Otherwise, pare down as much as possible.

Final word

Don’t just learn your storytelling from films and TV! Keep reading prose as well, to keep in practice with that medium – so you give the reader the best possible experience.   

There’s a lot more about this in my Nail Your Novel books – find them here. If you’re curious about my own work, find novels here and my travel memoir here. And if you’re curious about what’s going on at my own writing desk, here’s my latest newsletter. You can subscribe to future updates here.

, , , , , , ,

  1. #1 by Sascha Darlington on April 10, 2022 - 2:44 pm

    Excellent advice!

  2. #3 by Bridgette on April 10, 2022 - 3:53 pm

    Thanks for a great reminder that we must pay attention to things if we want to tell a richly engaging story.

  3. #5 by Audrey Driscoll on April 11, 2022 - 2:32 am

    Some of this may be due to advice to writers: too much description is bad; don’t use the word “was”; too much backstory is bad; don’t use “felt” or “thought.” Throw in TV/movie brain, and prose becomes anemic.

    • #6 by Roz Morris @Roz_Morris on April 11, 2022 - 6:53 am

      Interesting point, Audrey. Another area that’s puzzling is the advice to show not tell. Writers often think it means ‘do it like a movie would, because a movie can only show, it can’t tell.’

      • #7 by Rachel McAlpine on April 12, 2022 - 3:13 am

        Roz, my thoughts exactly. The conventional advice to “Show, don’t tell” is time-honored and now dated. Once a common fault of novice writers was to over-explain. Now we are all soaked in movies and need this excellent advice. I don’t think I’ve read your advice from anyone else!

  4. #9 by Davida Chazan on April 11, 2022 - 12:01 pm

    True, but… sometimes while watching TV I start describing what I’m seeing in my head… I’m very strange. Mind you, if a book is well written, I can usually picture what is happening in my head, while I’m reading.

    • #10 by Roz Morris @Roz_Morris on April 11, 2022 - 2:55 pm

      Hi Davida! This raises an interesting question… what is prose description? It’s more than the visual input. And when we read, we don’t just translate the words into a pictorial representation. We experience feelings too.
      And I’ve never come across anyone who did that while watching a film or TV! An interesting addition to the debate!

      • #11 by Davida Chazan on April 11, 2022 - 3:08 pm

        Well, it could be the old “show, don’t tell” bit. I just finished reading James Baldwin’s novel “Giovanni’s Room” and it was practically a 3D experience for me! As for my narrating what I see on TV, it is more short phrases than whole descriptions.

  5. #12 by Maria Donovan on April 11, 2022 - 2:16 pm

    It’s a funny thing that TV gives us sight and sound but taste touch and smell still have to be ‘understood’ in some way. Prose can sometimes give a more complete sensory experience – just through words. It’s an intriguing process. Very interesting points, Roz!

    • #13 by Roz Morris @Roz_Morris on April 11, 2022 - 2:53 pm

      Hi Maria! It’s almost a paradox, isn’t it? TV and film can give us several sensory experiences at once – vision and sound. You could also claim movement is a sensory stimulus of its own because it produces a visceral reaction in the viewer. Prose is, as you say, just words, but it can create an emotional experience on an incredibly intimate level. That’s quite magical if you think about it.

  6. #14 by OIKOS™- Art, Books & more on April 11, 2022 - 10:54 pm

  7. #17 by OIKOS™- Art, Books & more on April 11, 2022 - 10:54 pm

    Thanks for the advice. A very interesting topic, and so important to overthink. Have a great week! xx Michael

  8. #19 by jmchristie66 on April 12, 2022 - 2:59 pm

    Great advice, all! There is more planning to writing than we think. It’s not all art.

  9. #21 by Annalisa Crawford on April 18, 2022 - 1:54 pm

    Interesting advice. In my case, too much TV means I start watching instead of writing 🙂

Your turn!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: